Gemeinschaft Europaischer Kunstler Anastalt v. Miami Freedom Tower, Inc.

625 So. 2d 83, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9608, 1993 WL 392684
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1993
DocketNo. 93-1554
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 83 (Gemeinschaft Europaischer Kunstler Anastalt v. Miami Freedom Tower, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gemeinschaft Europaischer Kunstler Anastalt v. Miami Freedom Tower, Inc., 625 So. 2d 83, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9608, 1993 WL 392684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gemeinschaft Europaischer Kunstler Anastalt, a Liechtenstein corporation, seeks review of an order compelling answers to certain interrogatories. For the following reasons, we grant the petition and quash the order under review.

Petitioner is suing to foreclose on first and second mortgages that it holds on the Freedom Tower. Alfred Aronovitz, as trustee and holder of a third mortgage, served interrogatories on Petitioner by which he sought to discover the identities of the beneficial owners of the Liechtenstein corporation. Although Aronovitz may be able to demonstrate that he is entitled to the information he seeks at some later point in the litigation, we are not able to discern any basis to compel the disclosure of the corporation’s owners at this stage of the proceeding. See Jerry’s South, Inc. v. Morran, 582 So.2d 803 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (protective order should be granted where information sought by discovery is not shown to be related to any pending claim or defense, or shown to be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence).

Accordingly, we grant the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and quash the order under review without prejudice to respondent to seek disclosure of such information if and when the posture of the litigation so warrants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc.
718 So. 2d 956 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Robbins v. Friedman
625 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 So. 2d 83, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9608, 1993 WL 392684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gemeinschaft-europaischer-kunstler-anastalt-v-miami-freedom-tower-inc-fladistctapp-1993.