Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc.

718 So. 2d 956, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13261, 1998 WL 727535

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 16, 1998

DocketNo. 98-2034

StatusPublished

This text of 718 So. 2d 956 (Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc., 718 So. 2d 956, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13261, 1998 WL 727535 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is a petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court seeking to quash a discovery order.

Because we agree with petitioner that the discovery sought is either irrelevant, not shown likely to lead to relevant information, or seeks disallowed discovery, we issue the writ and quash the order. See Compton & Assocs., P.A. v. Porlick, Poliquin, Samara, Inc., 662 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Gemeinschaft Europaischer Kunstler Anastalt v. Miami Freedom Tower, Inc., 625 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Jerry’s South, Inc. v. Morran, 582 So.2d 803 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

ORDER QUASHED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI