Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc.

718 So. 2d 956, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13261, 1998 WL 727535

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1998·No. No. 98-2034·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is a petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court seeking to quash a discovery order.

Because we agree with petitioner that the discovery sought is either irrelevant, not shown likely to lead to relevant information, or seeks disallowed discovery, we issue the writ and quash the order. See Compton & Assocs., P.A. v. Porlick, Poliquin, Samara, Inc., 662 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Gemeinschaft Europaischer Kunstler Anastalt v. Miami Freedom Tower, Inc., 625 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Jerry’s South, Inc. v. Morran, 582 So.2d 803 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

ORDER QUASHED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is a petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court seeking to quash a discovery order.

Because we agree with petitioner that the discovery sought is either irrelevant, not shown likely to lead to relevant information, or seeks disallowed discovery, we issue the writ and quash the order. See Compton & Assocs., P.A. v. Porlick, Poliquin, Samara, Inc., 662 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Gemeinschaft Europaischer Kunstler Anastalt v. Miami Freedom Tower, Inc., 625 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Jerry’s South, Inc. v. Morran, 582 So.2d 803 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

ORDER QUASHED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc., 718 So. 2d 956, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13261, 1998 WL 727535 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

718 So. 2d 956 (Airocar, Inc. v. Suncoast Representation Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related