Geltman v. St. Agnes Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Geltman v. St. Agnes Hospital

186 A.D.2d 534, 588 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11143

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 534 (Geltman v. St. Agnes Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geltman v. St. Agnes Hospital, 186 A.D.2d 534, 588 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), dated July 30, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although it has been held that monetary sanctions are preferred over dismissal (see, Rosner v Blue Channel Corp., 131 AD2d 654), it has also been held that where a party frustrates attempts at disclosure through deliberate and contumacious acts, dismissal is proper (see, DeMasi v Dine, 155 AD2d 583; see also, Lobo Equities v North Riv. Ins. Co., 124 AD2d 647). In spite of the repeated requests and orders directing the plaintiff to involve herself in pretrial disclosure, she did not. Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3126. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), dated July 30, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although it has been held that monetary sanctions are preferred over dismissal (see, Rosner v Blue Channel Corp., 131 AD2d 654), it has also been held that where a party frustrates attempts at disclosure through deliberate and contumacious acts, dismissal is proper (see, DeMasi v Dine, 155 AD2d 583; see also, Lobo Equities v North Riv. Ins. Co., 124 AD2d 647). In spite of the repeated requests and orders directing the plaintiff to involve herself in pretrial disclosure, she did not. Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3126. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 534, 588 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geltman-v-st-agnes-hospital-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack