DeCicco v. Nassau Radiological Group
This text of 276 A.D.2d 582 (DeCicco v. Nassau Radiological Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated October 12, 1999, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff disregarded the defendants’ demands for disclosure and an order of the Supreme Court directing disclosure. The belated disclosure she provided in response to the defendants’ instant motion to dismiss was inadequate. Furthermore, she failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for the [583]*583inordinate delay. The plaintiffs conduct in this case supports an inference that her noncompliance was willful and contumacious. Consequently, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing the complaint (see, Ranfort v Peak Tours, 250 AD2d 747; Geltman v St. Agnes Hosp., 186 AD2d 534; DeMasi v Dine, 155 AD2d 583). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 A.D.2d 582, 715 N.Y.S.2d 324, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decicco-v-nassau-radiological-group-nyappdiv-2000.