Gelpcke v. Dubuque
This text of 68 U.S. 220 (Gelpcke v. Dubuque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
GELPCKE ET AL.
v.
THE CITY OF DUBUQUE.
Supreme Court of United States.
*221 Mr. JUSTICE SWAYNE, after stating the difference between the case and No. 80, and quoting this act, thus delivered the opinion of the court:
"In this act it is clearly implied that cities have authority to subscribe for railroad stock, and to issue their bonds in payment of it. What is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed. (United States v. Babbitt, 1 Black, 61.) Considering the subject in the light of these acts, we entertain no doubt that the city possessed the power to issue these bonds."
JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 U.S. 220, 1 Wall. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gelpcke-v-dubuque-scotus-1864.