Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Opinion
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP S| DLEY 787 SEVENTH AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10019 +1 212 839 5300 +1 212 839 5599 FAX +1 212 839 7341 MLEVY@SIDLEY.COM AMERICA ¢ ASIA PACIFIC « EUROPE November 16, 2020 By ECF — USDC SDNY DOCUMENT The Honorable John P. Cronan ELECTRONICALLY FILED United States District Court DOC #: Southern District of New York DATE FILED: 11/17/2020 500 Pearl Street, Room 1320 New York, NY 10007 Re: — Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 20 Civ. 4334 (JPC) Application to Redact and File Under Seal Defendant’s Reply Brief Dear Judge Cronan: We represent Defendant Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Amunix”) in this matter. Amunix respectfully seeks leave to file under seal those portions of its reply brief in support of the motion to dismiss that describe the Second FSA. On November 10, 2020, Your Honor granted Amunix’s application to file under seal the Second FSA and any descriptions of its terms. (Dkt. No. 43). Your Honor found that the competitive harm that could result from disclosure of the Second FSA overcame the presumption of open records under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), and that Amunix’s proposed redactions to the complaint, briefs in support and opposition to the motion, and other filings were appropriately tailored. (Dkt. No. 43). Consistent with that Order and Individual Rule 4.B., Amunix moves to have filed under seal similar portions of the reply brief that directly quote or otherwise describe the confidential and sensitive terms of the Second FSA for the same reasons previously described and accepted. (Dkt. No. 39). Pursuant to Your Honor’s Individual Rules, Amunix is publicly filing a copy of the reply brief with the proposed redactions and filing under seal an unredacted copy of the reply brief with the proposed redactions highlighted. (See Individual Rule 4.C.111). Counsel for Plaintiff consents to this request.
Sidley Austin (NY) LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership doing business as Sidley Austin LLP and practicing in affiliation with other Sidley Austin partnerships.
Page 2 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Michael A. Levy Michael A. Levy Christopher Egleson Qais Ghafary Counsel for Defendant Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ce: Counsel for Plaintiff (By ECF)
For the reasons stated above, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's request to file under seal the portions of its Reply referring to the FSA is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Date: November 16, 2020 New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.