Geddes v. Davis

210 P. 586, 36 Idaho 207, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 164
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 21, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 P. 586 (Geddes v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geddes v. Davis, 210 P. 586, 36 Idaho 207, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 164 (Idaho 1922).

Opinion

GIVENS, District Judge.

In this action the motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no transcript had been filed by appellant has heretofore been denied.

The conclusions reached in the case of Hyrum Geddes, Respondent, v. John C. Davis, Director-General of Railroads, Appellant, ante, p. 201, 210 Pac. 584, render it unnecessary to further consider the appeal herein. For the reason therein given, this cause is reversed and remanded with instructions to the trial court to reinstate the judgment first entered ,in favor .of plaintiff below, appellant herein, against Walker D. Hines, Director-General of Railroads, for the sum of $8,500 and interest from Nov. 21, 1919. Costs awarded to appellant.

Rice, C. J., and McCarthy and Dunn, JJ., concur.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barge, Liquidator v. Town of Dunnellon
148 So. 761 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 P. 586, 36 Idaho 207, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geddes-v-davis-idaho-1922.