GE Transportation Parts, LLC v. Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 10, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-04826·Unknown

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ae ae □□□ □□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee

GE Transportation Parts, LLC, Plaintiff, 19-CV-4826 (AJN) —y— ORDER Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC, Defendant.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The parties have jointly submitted proposed redaction of this Court’s June 1, 2020 Memorandum and Order. However, the parties’ filing does not comply with this Court’s Individual Civil Rule 4 and does not explain who the proposed redactions would comport with the Second Circuit’s decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). Within one week of the date of this order, the parties should jointly re-submit compliant redaction requests.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 10, 2020 I. i ir New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GE Transportation Parts, LLC v. Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

GE Transportation Parts, LLC v. Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC (GE Transportation Parts, LLC v. Central Railway Manufacturing, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)