Gay v. Wadley

12 S.E. 298, 86 Ga. 103, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 191
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1890·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, C. J.

The plaintiff’s mare having run along the railway-track ahead of the train of her own accord until, reaching a trestle or open culvert, she fell into it and was injured, and the evidence showing that the train was almost stopped to give her time to escape, and that the whistle was continuously blown to frighten her from the track, and that the disaster was caused by her own obstinacy in following the track when she might have left it, the owner of the mare had no cause of action against the owner of the railway, and the presiding judge did not err in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed,.

From Emanuel superior court, April term, 1890. Before Judge Hines. Rogers & Potter, for plaintiff. ' No appearance for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gay v. Wadley, 12 S.E. 298, 86 Ga. 103, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 191 (Ga. 1890).

12 S.E. 298 (Gay v. Wadley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tuggle v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.
113 S.E. 36 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Savannah & Atlanta Railway v. Jones
97 S.E. 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Ford
139 Tenn. 505 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1917)
Southern Railway Co. v. Frix
73 S.E. 1057 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Buice
14 S.E. 205 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)