Gay Times, Inc. v. Louisiana

Supreme Court

Gay Times, Inc. v. Louisiana

414 U.S. 994, 94 S. Ct. 346, 38 L. Ed. 2d 232, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1195

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 5, 1973

Docket73-4

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 414 U.S. 994 (Gay Times, Inc. v. Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gay Times, Inc. v. Louisiana, 414 U.S. 994, 94 S. Ct. 346, 38 L. Ed. 2d 232, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1195 (1973).

Pincite

Opinions

Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari in this case and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari in this case and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 U.S. 994, 94 S. Ct. 346, 38 L. Ed. 2d 232, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gay-times-inc-v-louisiana-scotus-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack