Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gates v. State

Gates v. State

535 So. 2d 359, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 10, 1989 WL 88
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 1989
DocketNo. 87-3063
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 535 So. 2d 359 (Gates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gates v. State, 535 So. 2d 359, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 10, 1989 WL 88 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record shows that during the oral pronouncement of sentence, the trial judge made inconsistent statements concerning whether he intended to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences on appellant. The sentences rendered maintained this inconsistency. Therefore, we affirm appellant’s convictions and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to clarify the sentences imposed and to enter such corrected sentencing orders as may be appropriate.

[360]*360AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.

LETTS, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kathleen Maier Coello v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Tory v. State
686 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Mitchell v. State
681 So. 2d 891 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Newton v. State
603 So. 2d 558 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
535 So. 2d 359, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 10, 1989 WL 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.