Gates v. Horning

637 P.2d 940, 55 Or. App. 261, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4060
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 21, 1981·No. No. 77-7-31, CA 19904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented in this appeal is the meaning of the term “transfer” in a confession of judgment executed by defendant and his late wife.

Defendant argues that the deed to his new wife did not constitute a “transfer.” We disagree.

W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. McCoy, 96 Or 474, 190 P 311 (1920); Hammond v. Oregon etc. R.R. Co., 117 Or 244, 243 P 767, cert den 273 US 707.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gates v. Horning, 637 P.2d 940, 55 Or. App. 261, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4060 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

637 P.2d 940 (Gates v. Horning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammond v. Oregon & California Railroad
243 P. 767 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. McCoy
190 P. 311 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)