Gates v. Horning

637 P.2d 940, 55 Or. App. 261, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4060
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 21, 1981
DocketNo. 77-7-31, CA 19904
StatusPublished

This text of 637 P.2d 940 (Gates v. Horning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gates v. Horning, 637 P.2d 940, 55 Or. App. 261, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4060 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented in this appeal is the meaning of the term “transfer” in a confession of judgment executed by defendant and his late wife.

Defendant argues that the deed to his new wife did not constitute a “transfer.” We disagree.

W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. McCoy, 96 Or 474, 190 P 311 (1920); Hammond v. Oregon etc. R.R. Co., 117 Or 244, 243 P 767, cert den 273 US 707.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammond v. Oregon & California Railroad
243 P. 767 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. McCoy
190 P. 311 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 P.2d 940, 55 Or. App. 261, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gates-v-horning-orctapp-1981.