Gaston v. Coughlin

182 A.D.2d 1085, 582 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6949
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 24, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 182 A.D.2d 1085 (Gaston v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaston v. Coughlin, 182 A.D.2d 1085, 582 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Determination unanimously annulled on the law and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: On May 19, 1990, there was a food strike at the Auburn Correctional Facility. Based upon confidential information received from an inmate by a correction officer, petitioner was charged with organizing the food strike in violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (5) (iii). After a Tier III rehearing, at which petitioner and two other inmates testified that petitioner had not been involved in the food strike, petitioner was found guilty.

The record of the Tier III rehearing shows that there was no evidence against petitioner except the conclusory statement of the informant, which was related by the correction officer who received the information. Although the informant was identified during in camera testimony, he did not testify, and there was no evidence corroborating his information. The record was insufficient to enable the Hearing Officer to assess the reliability of that information. Thus, the proof does not constitute substantial evidence and is insufficient to support the determination (see, Matter of Carter v Kelly, 159 AD2d 1006, 1008; Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, 148 AD2d 779, 780; Matter of Alvarado v LeFevre, 111 AD2d 475). All references to these charges must be expunged from petitioner’s files.

We have examined petitioner’s other contention and find it to be without merit. (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present —Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

49th Street Management Co. v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission
277 A.D.2d 103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Allen v. Goord
252 A.D.2d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Cotto v. Bautista
252 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Echavarria-Brand v. Coombe
231 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
MTR. OF ABDUR-RAHEEM v. Mann
647 N.E.2d 1266 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Aponte v. Coughlin
204 A.D.2d 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Boyd v. Coughlin
191 A.D.2d 1045 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 1085, 582 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaston-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1992.