Gaster v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

67 F. App'x 821
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 25, 2003
Docket03-6544
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 F. App'x 821 (Gaster v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaster v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 67 F. App'x 821 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frank M. Gaster, who was civilly committed under the South Carolina Sexually Violent Predator Act, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition, properly construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. * We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gaster has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

Although Gaster originally filed the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, because he challenged the constitutionality of a state civil commitment, the magistrate judge properly characterized it as a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monti v. Gaal
S.D. West Virginia, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 F. App'x 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaster-v-south-carolina-department-of-corrections-ca4-2003.