Gaster v. Beasley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 17, 1996·No. 95-7233·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7233

FRANK M. GASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID M. BEASLEY, Governor of South Carolina; JAMES L. HARVEY, Regional Administrator of the South Carolina Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-339-2-20AJ)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank M. Gaster, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK, BAKER & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gaster v. Beasley, No. CA-95-339-2-20AJ (D.S.C. July 20, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaster v. Beasley, (4th Cir. 1996).

Gaster v. Beasley (Gaster v. Beasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related