Gaster v. Beasley
This text of Gaster v. Beasley (Gaster v. Beasley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7233
FRANK M. GASTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID M. BEASLEY, Governor of South Carolina; JAMES L. HARVEY, Regional Administrator of the South Carolina Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-339-2-20AJ)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank M. Gaster, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK, BAKER & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-
lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gaster v. Beasley, No. CA-95-339-2-20AJ (D.S.C. July 20, 1995). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gaster v. Beasley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaster-v-beasley-ca4-1996.