Gass v. Wetmore
191 N.E. 636, 264 N.Y. 704, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1747
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding the following: “ Upon the appeal herein the defendants contended that the contract sued on was illegal under the provisions of the National Prohibition Act and such contention was sustained by the court.” (See 264 N. Y. 663.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gass v. Wetmore, 191 N.E. 636, 264 N.Y. 704, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1747 (N.Y. 1934).
191 N.E. 636 (Gass v. Wetmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gass v. Wetmore, Kittredge
191 N.E. 615 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)