Gass v. Wetmore
191 N.E. 636, 264 N.Y. 704, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1747
This text of 191 N.E. 636 (Gass v. Wetmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gass v. Wetmore, 191 N.E. 636, 264 N.Y. 704, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1747 (N.Y. 1934).
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding the following: “ Upon the appeal herein the defendants contended that the contract sued on was illegal under the provisions of the National Prohibition Act and such contention was sustained by the court.” (See 264 N. Y. 663.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gass v. Wetmore, Kittredge
191 N.E. 615 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
191 N.E. 636, 264 N.Y. 704, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gass-v-wetmore-ny-1934.