Gaskins v. Attorney General, the District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
)
ZAKIYA GASKINS, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 15-cv-2065 (TSC)
)
)
ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Zakiya Gaskins brings this writ of habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254. Gaskins was sentenced by a District of Columbia Superior Court judge to 90 months imprisonment and 10 years supervised release for child sex abuse. In this action, Gaskins claims that her sentence violated her constitutional right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.
On April 13, 2016, the court issued an order advising Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, that she had until May 10, 2016 to show cause why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction. See D.C. Code § 23-110(g); § 23-110(a); Williams v. Martinez, 586 F.3d 995, 998 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (federal courts do not have jurisdiction to hear habeas petitions by prisoners who could have raised their claims in the District of Columbia courts under D.C. code § 23-110(a). The court also advised Plaintiff that if she failed to respond to the show cause order, she risked dismissal of this action without further notice.
Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff has not responded to the show cause order, nor has she sought an extension of time in which to respond. Accordingly, the court will dismiss this action.
Date: May 16, 2016
Tanya S. Chutkan
TANYA S. CHUTKAN
United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gaskins v. Attorney General, the District of Columbia (Gaskins v. Attorney General, the District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.