Gaskin v. Westbourne Associates

59 A.D.3d 362, 873 N.Y.S.2d 307
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J), entered February 13, 2008, which dismissed the petition seeking to annul the determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petition challenging the Division’s finding that there was no probable cause to support her claims that respondent Westbourne Associates, L.E engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices related to housing based on petitioner’s race/color, creed or sex (see Executive Law § 296 [5] [a] [2]) was properly dismissed for failure to allege facts sufficient to show that the Division’s determination was arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108 [1998]).

Fetitioner’s remaining arguments are unavailing. Concur— Tom, J.E, Andrias, Nardelli, Buckley and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaskin v. Westbourne Associates, 59 A.D.3d 362, 873 N.Y.S.2d 307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

59 A.D.3d 362 (Gaskin v. Westbourne Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Division of Human Rights
82 A.D.3d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Bush v. Division of Human Rights
78 A.D.3d 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)