Allen v. Division of Human Rights
82 A.D.3d 585, 918 N.Y.2d 720
Opinion
The challenged determination that there existed no probable cause to believe that respondent New York City Transit Authority had engaged in age and/or national origin discrimination was rationally based and therefore not subject to judicial disturbance (see Gaskin v Westbourne Assoc., L.P., 59 AD3d 362 [2009]; Matter of Malone v New York City Commn. on Human Rights, 29 AD3d 364 [2006]; Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108 [1998]). Concur- — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allen v. Division of Human Rights, 82 A.D.3d 585, 918 N.Y.2d 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
82 A.D.3d 585 (Allen v. Division of Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Malone v. New York City Commission on Human Rights
29 A.D.3d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Gaskin v. Westbourne Associates
59 A.D.3d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
McFarland v. New York State Division of Human Rights
241 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)