Allen v. Division of Human Rights

82 A.D.3d 585, 918 N.Y.2d 720

This text of 82 A.D.3d 585 (Allen v. Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Division of Human Rights, 82 A.D.3d 585, 918 N.Y.2d 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The challenged determination that there existed no probable cause to believe that respondent New York City Transit Authority had engaged in age and/or national origin discrimination was rationally based and therefore not subject to judicial disturbance (see Gaskin v Westbourne Assoc., L.P., 59 AD3d 362 [2009]; Matter of Malone v New York City Commn. on Human Rights, 29 AD3d 364 [2006]; Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108 [1998]). Concur- — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Malone v. New York City Commission on Human Rights
29 A.D.3d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Gaskin v. Westbourne Associates
59 A.D.3d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
McFarland v. New York State Division of Human Rights
241 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 585, 918 N.Y.2d 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-2011.