Gaskin v. Cleveland Woolen Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Gaskin v. Cleveland Woolen Mills

132 P. 821, 38 Okla. 229

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 27, 1913

Docket4847

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 132 P. 821 (Gaskin v. Cleveland Woolen Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaskin v. Cleveland Woolen Mills, 132 P. 821, 38 Okla. 229 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

DUNN, J.

This case presents er-ror from the county court of Jefferson county. April 30, 1912, the motion for a new trial was denied, from which order the defendant on February 27, 1913, began proceedings in error in this court by filing his petition in error with case-made attached. April 30, 1913, counsel for plaintiff filed motion to dismiss because the proceeding in error was not begun in this court within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. • In view of the provisions of chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11, wherein it is provided that all proceedings for reversing, vacating, or modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of, the motion must be sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUNN, J.

This case presents er-ror from the county court of Jefferson county. April 30, 1912, the motion for a new trial was denied, from which order the defendant on February 27, 1913, began proceedings in error in this court by filing his petition in error with case-made attached. April 30, 1913, counsel for plaintiff filed motion to dismiss because the proceeding in error was not begun in this court within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. • In view of the provisions of chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11, wherein it is provided that all proceedings for reversing, vacating, or modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of, the motion must be sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 P. 821, 38 Okla. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaskin-v-cleveland-woolen-mills-okla-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack