Anderson v. Limerick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Anderson v. Limerick

1914 OK 426, 143 P. 183, 43 Okla. 484, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 551

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 22, 1914

Docket6560

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1914 OK 426 (Anderson v. Limerick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Limerick, 1914 OK 426, 143 P. 183, 43 Okla. 484, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 551 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

TURNER, J.

This cause is before us on motion of defendants in error to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the case-made and petition in error were not filed in this court within six months after the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. The record discloses that judgment was rendered on May 16, 1913; motion for new trial was duly filed and overruled by the trial court on June 23, 1913. The case-made was not filed in this court until June 23, 1914. Chapter 18, p. 35, Session Laws 1910-11, requiring appeals to be taken in six months became effective June 14, 1911, and, as the petition in error and case-made were not filed within six months from the rendition of the final order complained of, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the cause, and the motion to dismiss is sustained. State Savings Bank of Manchester, Iowa, v. Bedden et al., 38 Okla. 444, 134 Pac. 20; Healy v. Davis, 32 Okla. 296, 122 Pac. 157; Gaskin v. Cleveland Woolen Mills, 38 Okla. 229, 132 Pac. 821; Rolater v. Strain, 31 Okla. 58, 119 Pac. 992.

•All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TURNER, J.

This cause is before us on motion of defendants in error to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the case-made and petition in error were not filed in this court within six months after the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. The record discloses that judgment was rendered on May 16, 1913; motion for new trial was duly filed and overruled by the trial court on June 23, 1913. The case-made was not filed in this court until June 23, 1914. Chapter 18, p. 35, Session Laws 1910-11, requiring appeals to be taken in six months became effective June 14, 1911, and, as the petition in error and case-made were not filed within six months from the rendition of the final order complained of, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the cause, and the motion to dismiss is sustained. State Savings Bank of Manchester, Iowa, v. Bedden et al., 38 Okla. 444, 134 Pac. 20; Healy v. Davis, 32 Okla. 296, 122 Pac. 157; Gaskin v. Cleveland Woolen Mills, 38 Okla. 229, 132 Pac. 821; Rolater v. Strain, 31 Okla. 58, 119 Pac. 992.

•All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK 426, 143 P. 183, 43 Okla. 484, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-limerick-okla-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack