Garza, Christopher Alexander
This text of Garza, Christopher Alexander (Garza, Christopher Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,109-01
EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER GARZA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 9851-A IN THE 27th DISTRICT COURT FROM LAMPASAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Applicant was convicted of evading arrest with a vehicle and sentenced to twenty years’
imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,
and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal because an appellate lawyer was
not appointed by the trial court. Based on the record, the trial court has found that Applicant timely
requested an appeal, trial counsel was allowed to withdraw, and no appellate counsel was appointed
by the trial court.
Relief is granted. Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State,
98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of conviction in 2
cause number 9851 from the 27th District Court of Lampasas County. Within ten days from the date
of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant
is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent
on direct appeal. All deadlines shall be calculated as if Applicant was sentenced on the date of this
Court’s mandate. Should Applicant decide to appeal, must file a written notice of appeal in the trial
court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Applicant’s remaining claims are
dismissed. Ex Parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
Delivered: April 14, 2021
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garza, Christopher Alexander, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garza-christopher-alexander-texcrimapp-2021.