Garza, Christopher Alexander

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 22, 2020
DocketWR-91,109-01
StatusPublished

This text of Garza, Christopher Alexander (Garza, Christopher Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garza, Christopher Alexander, (Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,109-01

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER GARZA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 9851-A IN THE 27th DISTRICT COURT FROM LAMPASAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of evading arrest with a vehicle and sentenced to twenty years’

imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to secure a plea

bargain agreement and failed to secure Applicant’s right to appeal. The State filed an answer stating

that they offered Applicant a five year plea offer and trial counsel was allowed to withdraw before

the time to file a timely notice of appeal had passed. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might

entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should

be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. 2

art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In

developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial

court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings as to whether counsel communicated the State’s five year

plea offer to Applicant and whether Applicant ever informed counsel or the court of his desire to

appeal. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial

counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any

other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 22, 2020

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garza, Christopher Alexander, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garza-christopher-alexander-texcrimapp-2020.