Gary v. State

111 So. 3d 993, 2013 WL 1859190, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7286
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gary v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 So. 3d 355
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 2013·No. No. 1D12-812·Published

Opinion

PER .CURIAM.

Bradford Keith Gary appeals from a judgment and sentence entered after revocation of his probation. For one count, the court ordered Gary to serve a new term of probation. As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in ordering Gary to provide a DNA sample as a condition of probation pursuant to section 948.014(1), Florida Statutes (2011), because he does not meet the requirements of section 943.325(2)(g), Florida Statutes (2011). Accordingly, although we otherwise affirm, we reverse as to the erroneous condition of probation and remand with directions that the trial court strike that condition.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PADOVANO, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gary v. State, 111 So. 3d 993, 2013 WL 1859190, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7286 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

111 So. 3d 993 (Gary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.