Gary v. State

90 So. 3d 333, 2012 WL 1449323, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6633
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2012·No. No. 1D11-3374·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders* appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation. The trial court orally found that Appellant willfully and substantially violated condition five of his probation in two ways. Although the court revoked Appellant’s probation, it neglected to enter a formal, written order of revocation. Such an order is required. Fowler v. State, 79 So.3d 868, 868 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (citing Robinson v. State, 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). We, therefore, remand for entry of a revocation order consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Appellant need not be present for the entry of the order. See Fowler, 79 So.3d at 868.

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, THOMAS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gary v. State, 90 So. 3d 333, 2012 WL 1449323, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6633 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

90 So. 3d 333 (Gary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Fowler v. State
79 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Robinson v. State
74 So. 3d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)