Gary v. Hanna

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6487

GREGORY T. GARY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CHARLES B. HANNA, Henrico Police Detective, Individual and Official Capacity; BILL KEAUKER, Police Investigator, Individual and Official Capacity; J.D. HEDRICK, HPD Investigator, Individual and Official Capacity; J.W. ENSOR, Reporting Officer, Individual and Official Capacity; G.S. RUSSELL, JR., Review Supervisor, Individual and Official Capacity,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00104-JBF-FBS)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory T. Gary, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory T. Gary appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) (2006) for failure to state a claim upon which

relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Gary v. Hanna, No. 2:10-cv-00104-JBF-FBS

(E.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2010). We further deny Gary’s motion for

leave to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED