Gary v. Hanna

Fourth Circuit

Gary v. Hanna

382 F. App'x 266

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2010·No. No. 10-6487·Published

Opinion

[267]*267Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory T. Gary appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gary v. Hanna, No. 2:10-cv-00104-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2010). We further deny Gary’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[267]*267Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory T. Gary appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gary v. Hanna, No. 2:10-cv-00104-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2010). We further deny Gary’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gary v. Hanna, 382 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

382 F. App'x 266 (Gary v. Hanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related