Garvin v. Cochran

Supreme Court

Garvin v. Cochran

371 U.S. 27

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 15, 1962

DocketNo. 13, Misc., and No. 24, Misc.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 371 U.S. 27 (Garvin v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garvin v. Cochran, 371 U.S. 27 (1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. In view of the representations of the Attorney General of Florida that these actions for habeas corpus have become moot by reason of the death of the petitioner, the judgments of the Supreme Court of Florida are vacated and the causes are remanded for such proceedings as that court may deem appropriate.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. In view of the representations of the Attorney General of Florida that these actions for habeas corpus have become moot by reason of the death of the petitioner, the judgments of the Supreme Court of Florida are vacated and the causes are remanded for such proceedings as that court may deem appropriate.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

371 U.S. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garvin-v-cochran-scotus-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack