Garrison v. Otto

Nebraska Supreme Court

Garrison v. Otto

308 Neb. 372, 953 N.W.2d 568

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 5, 2021

DocketS-20-386

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 308 Neb. 372 (Garrison v. Otto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrison v. Otto, 308 Neb. 372, 953 N.W.2d 568 (Neb. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/30/2021 12:10 AM CDT

- 372 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports GARRISON v. OTTO Cite as 308 Neb. 372

Margaret L. Garrison, appellee, v. Logan M. Otto II, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___

Filed February 5, 2021. No. S-20-386.

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: John A. Colborn, Judge. Affirmed. Edith T. Peebles, of Brodkey, Cuddigan, Peebles, Belmont & Line, L.L.P., for appellant. Adam R. Little, of Ballew Hazen, P.C., L.L.O., for appellee. Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ. Per Curiam. This is an appeal of a domestic abuse protection order, which we moved to our docket. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) (Cum. Supp. 2018). The court, having considered the oral arguments and hav- ing reviewed the record de novo, finds that the domestic abuse protection order entered by the trial court should be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/30/2021 12:10 AM CDT

- 372 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports GARRISON v. OTTO Cite as 308 Neb. 372

Margaret L. Garrison, appellee, v. Logan M. Otto II, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___

Filed February 5, 2021. No. S-20-386.

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: John A. Colborn, Judge. Affirmed. Edith T. Peebles, of Brodkey, Cuddigan, Peebles, Belmont & Line, L.L.P., for appellant. Adam R. Little, of Ballew Hazen, P.C., L.L.O., for appellee. Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ. Per Curiam. This is an appeal of a domestic abuse protection order, which we moved to our docket. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) (Cum. Supp. 2018). The court, having considered the oral arguments and hav- ing reviewed the record de novo, finds that the domestic abuse protection order entered by the trial court should be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 Neb. 372, 953 N.W.2d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrison-v-otto-neb-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack