Garrett v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
This text of Garrett v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (Garrett v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
HARVEY GARRETT CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS CASE NO. 22-516
UNITED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY SECTION: “G” INSURANCE CO.
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.’s (“Defendant”) unopposed “Motion to Enforce Stay and Notice of Liquidation and Statutory Stay.”1 In the motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay this matter for six months because Defendant has recently been declared insolvent and placed into liquidation.2 The Fifth Circuit has recognized that “insolvent insurers are subject to the comprehensive oversight of state administrative agencies and courts” and “[f]ederal law consigns to the states the primary responsibility for regulating the insurance industry.”3 Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit has held that “allowing a creditor or claimant to proceed against an insolvent insurer in federal court while a state insolvency proceeding is pending would usurp [the state’s] control over the liquidation proceeding by allowing [the claimant] to preempt others in the distribution of [the insurance company’s] assets.”4 Such a statutory scheme exists in Louisiana. Under Louisiana law,
1 Rec. Doc. 19. 2 Id. at 3. 3 Clark v. Fitzgibbons, 105 F.3d 1049, 1051 (5th Cir. 1997) (citing the McCarran–Ferguson Act). 4 Id. (internal citation and quotation omitted).
1 proceedings in which the insolvent insurer 1s a party or is obligated to defend a party in any court in this state shall be stayed for six months.”° In light of Louisiana’s comprehensive statutory scheme for regulating insolvent insurers and Fifth Circuit precedent admonishing courts to avoid interfering with state administrative processes involving insolvent insurers, the Court exercises its discretion to stay the claims pending against Defendant for a period of six months.° IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s unopposed “Motion to Enforce Stay and Notice of Liquidation and Statutory Stay”’ is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned action is STAYED AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED for a period of six months. The case shall be reopened upon a motion of a party at the conclusion of the six-month period. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 6th day of March, 2023.
NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 La. Rev. Stat. § 22:2068(A). 6 See Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). T Rec. Doc. 19.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garrett v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-united-property-and-casualty-insurance-co-laed-2023.