Garrett v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION

CARL GARRETT, □ Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:24-cv-39 v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.

ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation for the Court to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against the Georgia Department of Corrections. Doc. 11. Plaintiff did not file Objections to this Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has elapsed. Accordingly, upon review, I find no clear error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and ADOPT the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (If no specific objections are made or no objections are made at all, “the appropriate standard of review for the report and recommendation is clear error.”’). I DISMISS Plaintiff's claims against the Georgia Department of Corrections. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Wilson, Arthur, Edwards, Glover, and Warren remain pending. Doc. 12. SO ORDERED, this IF say of June, 2025.

GLCELLE!’ BLEJ. RANDAL HALL TATES DISTRICT COURT io ERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA