Garrett v. Georgia Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia
DecidedMay 21, 2025
Docket6:24-cv-00039
StatusUnknown

This text of Garrett v. Georgia Department of Corrections (Garrett v. Georgia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garrett v. Georgia Department of Corrections, (S.D. Ga. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION

CARL GARRETT,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:24-cv-39

v.

SERGEANT WILSON, et al.,

Defendants.

O RDE R Plaintiff filed this action, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Doc. 1. This Court has conducted its frivolity screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and has concluded the following portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint survive frivolity review: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force and deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Sergeant Wilson, Officer Arthur, Unit Manager Edwards, Unit Manager Glover, and Deputy Warden Warren. Therefore, a copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint, doc. 1, a copy of this Order, and a copy of the undersigned’s Report recommending dismissing some of Plaintiff’s claims (which is being issued contemporaneously with this Order) shall be served upon Defendants Wilson, Arthur, Edwards,

1 Rodrekus Watson is listed as a plaintiff in the caption of this Complaint and has requested relief. Doc. 1. However, Rodrekus Watson did not sign the Complaint under penalty of perjury, nor has he submitted any other item for filing or been added to the docket as a plaintiff. To the extent Plaintiff Garrett has attempted to file this Complaint with another individual as a single cause of action, he cannot do so. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (“PLRA”) provides a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis must pay the full filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has determined the language of the PLRA requires each prisoner to pay the full amount of the filing fee or face dismissal of his case. Hubbard v. Haley, 262 F.3d 1194, 1197–98 (11th Cir. 2001). Thus, Plaintiff cannot seek relief on behalf of fellow inmates. Gandy v. Bryson, 799 F. App’x 790, 792 (11th Cir. 2020). I DIRECT the Clerk of Court to provide one blank copy of the Court-approved § 1983 complaint form for use by prisoner-plaintiffs and the standard in forma pauperis application to Rodrekus Watson at the address he provided, should he wish to pursue his own, separate cause of action. Glover, and Warren by the United States Marshal without prepayment of cost. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of this Report upon Plaintiff. The Court also provides the following instructions to the parties that will apply to the remainder of this action. INSTRUCTIONS TO ALL DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION

Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the undersigned directs service be effected by the United States Marshal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). In most cases, the marshal will first mail a copy of the complaint to a defendant by first-class mail and request the defendant waive formal service of summons. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d); Local R. 4.5. A defendant has a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons, and any defendant who fails to comply with the request for waiver must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown for the failure to return the waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Generally, a defendant who timely returns the waiver is not required to answer the complaint until 60 days after the date the marshal sent the request for waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any Defendant in this action is granted leave of court

to take the deposition of Plaintiff upon oral examination. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2). Defendants are further advised the Court’s standard 140-day discovery period will commence upon the filing of the last answer. Local R. 26.1. Defendants shall ensure all discovery, including Plaintiff’s deposition and any other depositions in the case, is completed within that discovery period. If a Defendant takes the deposition of any other person, Defendants are ordered to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30. As Plaintiff will not likely attend such a deposition, the Defendant taking the deposition must notify Plaintiff of the deposition and advise him he may serve on that Defendant written questions Plaintiff wishes to propound to the witness, if any. Defendants shall present such questions to the witness in order and word-for-word during the deposition. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(c). Plaintiff must submit the questions in a sealed envelope within 10 days of the notice of deposition. INSTRUCTIONS TO PLAINTIFF Plaintiff is charged with the responsibility of immediately informing this Court and

defense counsel of any change of address during the pendency of this action. Local R. 11.1. Plaintiff’s failure to notify the Court of a change in his address may result in dismissal of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of every pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court on each Defendant (or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, the Defendant’s attorney). Plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate stating the date on which a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to each Defendant or the Defendant’s counsel. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. “Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, [and] the file number.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a).

Plaintiff has the responsibility for pursuing this case. For example, if Plaintiff wishes to obtain facts and information about the case from a Defendant, Plaintiff must initiate discovery. See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. The discovery period in this case will expire 140 days after the filing of the last answer. Local R. 26.1. Plaintiff does not need the permission of the Court to begin discovery, and Plaintiff should begin discovery promptly and complete it within this time period. Id. Discovery materials should not be filed routinely with the Clerk of Court; exceptions include: when the Court directs filing; when a party needs such materials in connection with a motion or response, and then only to the extent necessary; and when needed for use at trial. Local R. 26.4. Interrogatories are a practical method of discovery for incarcerated persons. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubbard v. Haley
262 F.3d 1194 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garrett v. Georgia Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garrett-v-georgia-department-of-corrections-gasd-2025.