Garrett v. City of Atlanta

179 S.E. 597, 51 Ga. App. 69, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 559
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 8, 1935·No. 24295·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The affidavit of justification (stating the financial worth of Jordan & Garner) does not invalidate the bond; but, construing the bond together with the affidavit, the judge was authorized to find that the only persons who undertook to sign the certiorari bond as security were Jordan & Garner (whose name imports a partnership), and that B. H. Cleveland signed the name of Jordan & Garner as their agent. The authority of the agent of the partnership, signing the bond as security, should expressly appear. No' such authority appears in this case. Harwell v. Marshall, 125 Ga. 451 (54 S. E. 93); Southern Express Co. v. Wheeler, 72 Ga. 210; American National Insurance Co. v. Jordan, 26 Ga. App. 320 (105 S. E. 852). The court, therefore, properly dismissed the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., concurs. Guerry, J., dissents.

(See Chiles v. Atlanta, infra.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrett v. City of Atlanta, 179 S.E. 597, 51 Ga. App. 69, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 559 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

179 S.E. 597 (Garrett v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holloway v. City of Atlanta
92 S.E.2d 615 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Taylor v. City of Atlanta
67 S.E.2d 143 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Darby v. City of Atlanta
63 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Duncan v. City of Atlanta
200 S.E. 815 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)