Darby v. City of Atlanta
This text of 63 S.E.2d 906 (Darby v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where, as here, on a certiorari from a trial court, the certiorari bond is signed by one as agent for the surety named therein, the authority of such agent must expressly appear. The signature on the bond in this case being “Willis C. Darby, Jr. (Seal) Principal; At[580]*580lanía Bonding Co. (Seal), Inman T. Hams, Jr., Alty. in fact, Security”, no power of attorney being attached thereto and it not appearing that Inman T. Harris, Jr. was an official of or otherwise empowered to bind the security by his signature, the bond was not valid and the court did not err in dismissing the certiorari. Southern Exjress Co. v. Wheeler, 72 Ga. 210 (3); Foley & Williams Mfg. Co. v. Bell, 4 Ga. App. 447 (2) (61 S. E. 856); American National Insurance Co. v. Jordan, 26 Ga. App. 320 (105 S. E. 852); Harwell v. Marshall, 125 Ga. 451 (54 S. E. 93). This rule applies in all certiorari cases whether civil or criminal. Garrett v. City of Atlanta, 51 Ga. App. 69 (179 S. E. 597); Chiles v. City of Atlanta, 51 Ga. App. 69 (179 S. E. 596); Mantovani v. City of Atlanta, 43 Ga. App. 787 (160 S. E. 129).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 S.E.2d 906, 83 Ga. App. 579, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darby-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1951.