Garnett v. Golder
This text of Garnett v. Golder (Garnett v. Golder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 31, 2006 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court
ROBERT C. GARNETT, SR.,
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 05-1248 v. (District of Colorado) (D.C. No. 05-Z-422) GARY GOLDER, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
ORDER
Before BRISCOE, LUCERO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Appellant, Robert C. Garnett, filed an application for a writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on May 24, 2005, challenging the
calculation of his statutory discharge date. The district court concluded Garnett
had failed to exhaust his state remedies and dismissed the application. Garnett
now seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to enable him to appeal the
district court’s dismissal of his § 2241 application. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
Garnett’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is granted .
The brief Garnett filed with this court indicates he is no longer
incarcerated. Accordingly, Garnett was ordered to show cause as to why his application for a COA should not be dismissed as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna ,
523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). After reviewing the entire record on appeal, including
Garnett’s response to the order to show cause, this court concludes that the
application for COA is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Garnett’s appeal.
Entered for the Court ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk
By Deputy Clerk
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garnett v. Golder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garnett-v-golder-ca10-2006.