Garner v. Selsky

47 A.D.3d 1167, 849 N.Y.S.2d 456
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 47 A.D.3d 1167 (Garner v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garner v. Selsky, 47 A.D.3d 1167, 849 N.Y.S.2d 456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

During a telephone conversation with his wife, petitioner requested that she bring him some marihuana when visiting him. Consequently, he was charged in a misbehavior report with conspiracy to possess drugs, attempted smuggling and a violation of the facility telephone program. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, accompanying documentation, hearing testimony and confidential information comprise substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Sowell v Selsky, 43 AD3d 1226, 1226 [2007]; Matter of Reddick v Goord, 43 AD3d 503, 503 [2007]). To the extent that petitioner denied the allegations, a credibility issue was created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Rivera v Selsky, 43 AD3d 1210, 1210 [2007]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims that he was improperly denied the right to call witnesses and deprived of an impartial hearing, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shields v. Prack
133 A.D.3d 1025 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Adams v. Fischer
116 A.D.3d 1269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Carrero v. Fischer
106 A.D.3d 1299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Acosta v. Fischer
98 A.D.3d 1170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Cognata v. Fischer
85 A.D.3d 1456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Singh v. Bezio
67 A.D.3d 1223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Benston v. Fischer
67 A.D.3d 1139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Pertillar v. Fischer
64 A.D.3d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Morales v. Dubray
62 A.D.3d 1130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Diaz v. Smith
54 A.D.3d 1080 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Henriquez v. Dubray
51 A.D.3d 1350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.3d 1167, 849 N.Y.S.2d 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2008.