Carrero v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carrero v. Fischer

106 A.D.3d 1299, 964 N.Y.S.2d 917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.3d 1299 (Carrero v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrero v. Fischer, 106 A.D.3d 1299, 964 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a confidential investigation, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling and conspiring to introduce drugs into the correctional facility. The charges stemmed from correspondence that petitioner sent to his wife asking her to bring drugs to the correctional facility. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of both charges. The determination of guilt was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and confidential information provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Garner v Selsky, 47 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2008]). The testimony of both petitioner and his wife that the code words used in the letters did not refer to narcotics presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Reid v Goord, 34 AD3d 954, 955 [2006]). Petitioner’s procedural challenges, including that he was denied documentary evidence and the Hearing Officer was biased, have been reviewed and found to be unpreserved or without merit.

Peters, EJ., Stein, Spain and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a confidential investigation, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling and conspiring to introduce drugs into the correctional facility. The charges stemmed from correspondence that petitioner sent to his wife asking her to bring drugs to the correctional facility. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of both charges. The determination of guilt was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and confidential information provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Garner v Selsky, 47 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2008]). The testimony of both petitioner and his wife that the code words used in the letters did not refer to narcotics presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Reid v Goord, 34 AD3d 954, 955 [2006]). Petitioner’s procedural challenges, including that he was denied documentary evidence and the Hearing Officer was biased, have been reviewed and found to be unpreserved or without merit.

Peters, EJ., Stein, Spain and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.3d 1299, 964 N.Y.S.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrero-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack