Garner v. Rice
This text of Garner v. Rice (Garner v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT 222009 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NANCY MAYER WHlTT/NGT U.S. DISTRICT coug~· CLERIC
R. LEE GARNER, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1723 ) SUSAN RICE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before the court on review ofplaintiffs application to proceed in
forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the
complaint.
The Court has reviewed plaintiff s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by
pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted
by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,
must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239
(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint
contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a
short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand
for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose ofthe minimum
standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to
prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the
doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint is so vague and confusing that it utterly fails to "give the defendant fair
notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which it rests." Conley v. Gibson,
355 U.S. 41, 47-48 (1957). For this reason, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice
for failure to comply with Rule 8(a). An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is
issued separately.
United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garner v. Rice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-rice-dcd-2009.