Garner v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 97, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 448
Opinion
Each of these cases being controlled by the rulings in Sloan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 123 (92 S. E. 893), Banes v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 129 (92 S. E. 896), and Evans v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 739 (93 S. E. 231), there was no error on the part of the trial judge in. sustaining the demurrer to the amended answer and striking it, or in thereafter directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garner v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 97, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 448 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
94 S.E. 264 (Garner v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sloan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
92 S.E. 893 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Hanes v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
92 S.E. 896 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Evans v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
93 S.E. 231 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)