Garner v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 97, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 448
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 31, 1917
Docket8834; 8837
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 264 (Garner v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garner v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 97, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 448 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Ienkins, J.

Each of these cases being controlled by the rulings in Sloan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 123 (92 S. E. 893), Banes v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 129 (92 S. E. 896), and Evans v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 739 (93 S. E. 231), there was no error on the part of the trial judge in. sustaining the demurrer to the amended answer and striking it, or in thereafter directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sloan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
92 S.E. 893 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Hanes v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
92 S.E. 896 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Evans v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
93 S.E. 231 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 97, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garner-v-farmers-merchants-bank-gactapp-1917.