Evans v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

93 S.E. 231, 20 Ga. App. 739, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 3, 1917·No. 8833; 8836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bboyles, P. J.

Under the ruling in Sloan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, ante, 123 (92 S. E. 893), the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the amended answer and striking it, or in thereafter directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 93 S.E. 231, 20 Ga. App. 739, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

93 S.E. 231 (Evans v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garner v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
94 S.E. 264 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)