Garlisch v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
196 A.D. 948, 188 N.Y.S. 922
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the authority of Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario & Western R. Co. [196 App. Div. 384], decided herewith.- Rich, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Mills, J., votes to affirm upon the ground that the term “ negligence ” used in the portion of the charge criticised was intended to include the idea of proximate cause, with whom Jenks, P. J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garlisch v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co., 196 A.D. 948, 188 N.Y.S. 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
196 A.D. 948 (Garlisch v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
196 A.D. 384 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)