Garlisch v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garlisch v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.

196 A.D. 948, 188 N.Y.S. 922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D. 948 (Garlisch v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garlisch v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co., 196 A.D. 948, 188 N.Y.S. 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the authority of Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario & Western R. Co. [196 App. Div. 384], decided herewith.- Rich, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Mills, J., votes to affirm upon the ground that the term “ negligence ” used in the portion of the charge criticised was intended to include the idea of proximate cause, with whom Jenks, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the authority of Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario & Western R. Co. [196 App. Div. 384], decided herewith.- Rich, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Mills, J., votes to affirm upon the ground that the term “ negligence ” used in the portion of the charge criticised was intended to include the idea of proximate cause, with whom Jenks, P. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D. 948, 188 N.Y.S. 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garlisch-v-new-york-ontario-western-railway-co-nyappdiv-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack