Garlen v. Green Mansions, Inc.

9 A.D.2d 760, 193 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 27, 1959·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Order of Special Term reversed on the law and on the facts and the motion to strike the answer of the corporate defendant and the appearance of counsel in its behalf is granted with leave, in the exercise of discretion, to the said corporation to appear, answer and otherwise defend by independent counsel if it is so advised within 20 days from the entry of the order, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. While a corporation is usually a passive litigant in a stockholder’s derivative action, it may well be that the equitable relief sought in the complaint requires an appearance and answer by the corporate defendant. However, such appearance must be by independent counsel whose interests will not conflict with those of the individual defendant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Prank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garlen v. Green Mansions, Inc., 9 A.D.2d 760, 193 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

9 A.D.2d 760 (Garlen v. Green Mansions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haleck v. TRT, Inc.
7 Am. Samoa 3d 133 (High Court of American Samoa, 2003)
In Re Oracle Securities Litigation
829 F. Supp. 1176 (N.D. California, 1993)
Tydings v. Berk Enterprises
565 A.2d 390 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1989)
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kinsey
660 P.2d 660 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
Cannon v. US Acoustics Corporation
398 F. Supp. 209 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)
Rowen v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co. of Iowa
230 N.W.2d 905 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1975)
Lewis v. Shaffer Stores Company
218 F. Supp. 238 (S.D. New York, 1963)
Hausman v. Buckley
299 F.2d 696 (Second Circuit, 1962)