Garland v. Riebe
78 Pa. Super. 567, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 161
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 3, 1922·No. Appeal, No. 116·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
■ Every phase of the question involved is thoroughly considered and rightly decided in the opinion of the court below, which will be published in full in the report of this case.
For the reasons therein given the decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garland v. Riebe, 78 Pa. Super. 567, 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 161 (Pa. Ct. App. 1922).
78 Pa. Super. 567 (Garland v. Riebe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MBB Realty Ltd. Partnership v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (In re Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.)
509 B.R. 430 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Cummings v. Middlebury Township School District
79 Pa. D. & C. 20 (Tioga County Court of Common Pleas, 1951)
Ambridge Borough School District
59 Pa. D. & C. 73 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ricapito v. Bethlehem School District
25 A.2d 786 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Walters v. Topper
11 A.2d 649 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Potts v. Penn Township School District
193 A. 290 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Ickes v. Costlow
193 A. 287 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Foresman v. Gregg Township
147 A. 64 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Steele v. Apollo Borough School District
10 Pa. D. & C. 325 (Armstrong County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Winton Borough School Directors
4 Pa. D. & C. 779 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)