Garland v. Gilbert, Exr.
86 N.E.2d 802, 85 Ohio App. 55, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 128, 40 Ohio Op. 59, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 730
Opinion
OPINION
Submitted on motion of plaintiff-appellee to affirm the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas on the ground that no Bill of Exceptions has been filed within 40 days after the overruling of the motion for new trial.
A Bill of Exceptions is not required to review alleged errors appearing on the face of the record. Sec. 11564 GC. From the record it appears that the errors complained of may be exemplified without a Bill of Exceptions.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garland v. Gilbert, Exr., 86 N.E.2d 802, 85 Ohio App. 55, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 128, 40 Ohio Op. 59, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 730 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949).
86 N.E.2d 802 (Garland v. Gilbert, Exr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McVay v. McVay
338 N.E.2d 772 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1974)