Garland v. Gilbert, Exr.

86 N.E.2d 802, 85 Ohio App. 55, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 128, 40 Ohio Op. 59, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 730
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 18, 1949
Docket2029
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 N.E.2d 802 (Garland v. Gilbert, Exr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garland v. Gilbert, Exr., 86 N.E.2d 802, 85 Ohio App. 55, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 128, 40 Ohio Op. 59, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 730 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of plaintiff-appellee to affirm the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas on the ground that no Bill of Exceptions has been filed within 40 days after the overruling of the motion for new trial.

A Bill of Exceptions is not required to review alleged errors appearing on the face of the record. Sec. 11564 GC. From the record it appears that the errors complained of may be exemplified without a Bill of Exceptions.

Motion overruled.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McVay v. McVay
338 N.E.2d 772 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 N.E.2d 802, 85 Ohio App. 55, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 128, 40 Ohio Op. 59, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garland-v-gilbert-exr-ohioctapp-1949.