Gardner v. Columbian Ins.

9 F. Cas. 1165, 2 Cranch 550
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1825
DocketCase No. 5,225
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 F. Cas. 1165 (Gardner v. Columbian Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardner v. Columbian Ins., 9 F. Cas. 1165, 2 Cranch 550 (circtddc 1825).

Opinion

THE COURT

(THRÜSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)

said the offer to abandon was not

too late. They also said that evidence of overvaluation could be given only in support of the allegation of fraud. That overvaluation is not, per se, evidence of fraud, but was a circumstance proper for the consideration of the jury in considering the question of fraud; and that if they should find that the vessel was fraudulently overvalued, the plaintiff could not recover, even the value of the property, for the fraud would invalidate the contract altogether. Verdict for the plaintiff, $3,200.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sturm v. . Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.
63 N.Y. 77 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F. Cas. 1165, 2 Cranch 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-columbian-ins-circtddc-1825.