Gardner v. Columbian Ins.
9 F. Cas. 1165, 2 Cranch 473
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMay 15, 1824
DocketCase No. 5,224
StatusPublished
This text of 9 F. Cas. 1165 (Gardner v. Columbian Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gardner v. Columbian Ins., 9 F. Cas. 1165, 2 Cranch 473 (circtddc 1824).
Opinion
(nem. con.) was of opinion that the words of the policy did not justify an inference on the part of the defendants that the goods were to be. laden on board at Rio Janeiro, and that the salt was covered by this policy, although not laden, nor bulk broken, at Rio.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 F. Cas. 1165, 2 Cranch 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-columbian-ins-circtddc-1824.