Gardner v. Black Mountain Railway Co.

208 N.C. 822
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 20, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 208 N.C. 822 (Gardner v. Black Mountain Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardner v. Black Mountain Railway Co., 208 N.C. 822 (N.C. 1935).

Opinion

Pee, Oubiam.

Affirmed on authority of Taylor v. R. R., 203 N. C., 218, 165 S. E., 357; Bunn v. R. R., 169 N. C., 648, 86 S. E., 503; Bradley v. Coal Co., 169 N. C., 255, 85 S. E., 388.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradley v. Carolina Coal & Ice Co.
85 S.E. 388 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Taylor v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
165 S.E. 357 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Bunn v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
86 S.E. 503 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 N.C. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-black-mountain-railway-co-nc-1935.